Microsolo900T Low
Pressure/Shear Support surface for the Surgical
Table supplying Three Dimensional Volumetric Support
at the speed of light.
If you thought it was difficult to
predict the development of a pressure sore under what might be
considered as conventional clinical circumstances, it only
gets worse on a surgical table during extended surgical
procedures. Even the most commonly used assessment scales such as the
Norton
scale, Braden Scale and Waterloo Scale, or other well conceived
assessment tools do not take into consideration the extraordinary
intrinsic and extrinsic physiological and bio-mechanical issues
present in the surgical suite. Except for the presence of these
extraordinary issues one may never develop a pressure sore in a normal
clinical setting.
The introduction of anesthetic agents
and pharmaceuticals ( which induce hypotension ) and
cooling blankets (designed to retard tissue metabolic activity) play
havoc with peripheral circulation and normal tissue metabolism. Adding
to this dilemma, immobility on a very hard surface for an extended
period of time creates an environment conducive to the development of
subcutaneous tissue infarction (pressure sores). Interestingly,
studies as rare as they are on this particular subject demonstrate
that even though a 7 to 29% range of incidents for pressure sores
exists in the general acute care population, the incidence increases
to an alarming 12 to 66% rate for pressure sores acquired
intra-operatively.
Studies have shown that as the
length/time of surgery increases, the incidence/percentage of patients
with pressure sores also increases. Findings suggest that 8.5% of all
surgical patients who underwent operative procedures in excess of 3
hours developed pressure ulcers. Immediate postoperative clinical
findings of non-blanchable erythema of the skin within days progressed
to more advanced stages of pressure sores. Interestingly, more than
17% of the patients who underwent vascular surgery developed pressure
sores during the procedure. This would be expected as many of these
patients already have advanced vascular disease. Also, aging in
general carries with it many more risk
factors, the least of which is the skin's inability to withstand
extended periods of mechanical trauma.
Why no real solution until now ?
Practicality, need for surface stability and conventional technology
does not allow placement of a dynamic pressure (redistribution) relief
surface (low air loss) on a surgical table, even though the same laws
of physics (pressure offloading) which apply to the surgical table
also apply to hospital beds and wheelchair support surfaces.
Consequently the only solution has been static gel or viscoelastic
foam surfaces. These surfaces by their very physical nature will not
supply three dimensional volumetric redistribution of pressure (Figure
2 ).
|
|
( Click to Enlarge)
CT scan of subject in
prone position (control scan). Notice natural symmetry of
the gluteal area. Distances from the most posterior point of
the ischeal tuberosities to the skin surface are approx.
100mm. less the effects of gravity.
|
Limited compressibility of these
surfaces creates distortion and compression of soft tissue (tensile
stress) causing bony prominences to impale into muscle and
subcutaneous layers thereby compromising microcirculation exacerbating
an already deteriorating situation.
What is Three Dimensional Volumetric
Pressure Redistribution? It is the ability of the support surface
to conform to the anatomical characteristics of the subject in
suspension (cradling); therefore, redistributing pressure without
distorting/compressing soft tissue.
( Figure 3)
 |
( Figure 2 Click to
Enlarge)
CT scan of subject
supine position on a very commonly used viscoelastic
temperature sensitive low pressure surgical table surface.
Subcutaneous tissue and muscle has compressed and formed to
the shape of the CT table (bottoming out). The gluteal fold
has all but disappeared. Distance of ischeal
tuberosities(IT) to the skin surface has diminished by
approx 25mm. The left and right IT are impaling the muscle
tissue.
|
The normal orientation of subcutaneous
tissue, muscle and bone is maintained. Additionally, bony prominences
do not impale muscle and subcutaneous tissue.

( Figure 3 Click to Enlarge) |
CT scan of
subject supine position on the Microsolo surface. Natural
gluteal symmetry maintained, normal orientation of bone,
muscle and subcutaneous tissue maintained. Distances from
IT to surface of skin actually increased from the prone
position. No mechanical trauma present.
|
Features of the Microsolo900T
surgical table surface:
. Microprocessor
controlled auto profiling of patients height, weight and girth (no
manual set up required). System will re-adjust if patient position is
changed. Adjustment cycle immediate.
. No air loss through
support surface maintaining the aseptic environment of the operative
field.
. Low profile surface
with head, middle and foot sections detachable.
. Surfaces designed to
accommodate Amsco/Steris, Skytron, Castle and other surgical tables
and replaces existing standard table pads.
. Same surface material
(cover) as standard OR table pad.
. Rock solid stability
as the patient is cradled in a three dimensional manner.
. Easily conforms to
cooling/heating pads, grounding pads.
. Completely
radio-translucent
. Internal battery
back-up if center section is used for transport.
. Controller system can
be remotely located in utility room.
. Bariatric surfaces
available.